If you often buy fresh juice, you may want to invest in a juicer.The best can smash the goods of the entire farmer’s market into smooth, delicious juice with almost no foam; it is easy to put on the counter; it does not wake up the whole house; it is easy to clean; and it provides a good warranty (10 years is the industry standard ).
In order to get our first choice, we squeezed various juices from hardy root vegetables to green leafy vegetables, and considered the taste, texture, foam level and oxidation rate of the resulting juice.We also measured the amount of liquid produced and the amount of pulp left by each machine, as well as the speed and noise level of the juicer.Finally, with the help of mechanical engineers, we took apart several juicers to see if they were made of the same parts (although the size and price were different).In this guide, we pay special attention to the chewing (or “slow”) juicer.You can read more about the reasons in our FAQ section.Learn more about how Insider Reviews test and research kitchen products.
Best juicer overall: Omega VSJ843, $393.32 on Amazon. The Omega VSJ843 juicer only does one thing, but it is as good as any juicer we have tested.It also happens to have the best warranty of any juicer we have encountered.
Best compact juicer: Hurom HP slow juicer, Hurom $322.15 Hurom HP slow juicer is not only one of the most powerful models we have tested, it is also the most compact and user-friendly.
The best multi-purpose juicer: Kuvings Whole Slow Juicer, priced at $399.95 on Amazon. Ice cream maker.
Best self-feeding juicer: H200 Easy Clean slow juicer, HuromHurom’s H200 is priced at $489.30, which can process the whole fruit and discard the stainless steel filter, using a plastic filter that is easier to clean.
The Omega VSJ843 juicer does only one thing, but it is as good as anything we have tested.It also happens to have the best warranty of any juicer we have encountered.
Omega is one of the pronouns of juice production, and this is for good reason.During the two years of using VSJ843, we did not encounter any problems on this machine.In our methodical testing and daily use, it also produces some of the best juices.
This is the juicer of the juicer.There are no unstable parts, nothing to confuse or make a fuss about, and no pile of accessories and spare parts to make nut butter or sorbet.Although these may be good prospects for some people (we recommend them for you below), most people will never use it.
The normal filter and the fine filter are the only interchangeable parts. This is a machine and you can almost throw away the instructions because it is as intuitive as possible.
For about two years, we have repeatedly squeezed velvety, consistent juice from this machine.Nevertheless, it shattered, without creaking or groaning.
The biggest disadvantage of VSJ843 is its size.Our recommendation for a compact juicer is basically the same machine from the same manufacturer, but it is made exclusively for Hurom and is much smaller.
The reason we recommend this overall is its 15-year warranty (Hurom includes a 10-year motor warranty and a two-year parts warranty).
The Hurom HP slow juicer is not only one of the most powerful models we have tested, it is also the most compact and user-friendly.
Advantages: small size, intuitive design, 100% BPA-free plastic, 10-year motor warranty, easy to clean, high juice yield
Disadvantages: 2-year parts warranty, a bit slow (even according to the standards of a slow juicer), and the juice concentration is slightly lower than its more expensive competitors
Although Hurom’s HP Slow Juicer is the smallest machine we have tested, it uses the same powerful motor as the model that takes up almost twice the space (for example, our first choice, Omega VSJ843).We discovered this after disassembling and inspecting several highly rated juicers with the help of mechanical engineers-we describe this process in more detail in “Our Methodology” below.
HP is equipped with a fine filter, a larger filter that allows some pulp to pass through-which is always a good idea, nutritionally speaking-and two cleaning brushes.In other words, it has everything you need, but not what you don’t have.
It often contains the driest discarded pulp of every juicer we have tested. The resulting juice is clean, bright, refreshing, and almost foam-free.To be fair, it is not as rich and intense as the output of higher-priced competitors.
Thanks to the convenient paddle built into the handle, the cleaning brush can remove the pulp in hard-to-reach places excellently.
HP’s ease of use, simple cleanup, and compact size make it a clear winner for us.After all, if your juicer is compact enough to fit on a countertop instead of a cabinet, you will notice and use it more frequently.
Kuvings Whole Slow Juicer can produce rich, soft juice, surpassing the usual duty requirements, becoming a citrus juicer and ice cream manufacturer.
If you like the idea of a device that can perform four tasks, Kuvings Whole Slow Juicer is a good investment: in addition to the juice filter, it also comes with a smoothie and frozen dessert filter (both included), citrus squeezer The juice machine is sold separately.
The 3.2-inch wide inlet of the Whole Slow Juicer can hold larger pieces of fruit than our preferred choice. It will be a bit faster at 60 RPM, but at a price: Kuvings squeezes out the liquid from our fruits and vegetables Even less, its wetter pulp indicates that there is still some good stuff left in the discard pile.Nevertheless, it is still the richest and most stable juice we have made.
The Citrus accessory is simple and can get the job done, and although it is more expensive than needed, it is still much cheaper than buying a separate device.
We made a berry banana smoothie with a consistent texture, no foam, and smoother than anything we extract from the blender.The blank filter for frozen desserts is more difficult to grasp: we have succeeded in banana ice cream, but there is no other way.Making sorbets, ice creams, and ice creams effortlessly like this YouTuber requires a certain degree of freezing (and practice).
The main bone we want to pick: the chute turns awkwardly toward the auger, which can cause it to hang up, making it a more difficult juicer to clean.
Hurom’s H200 processes the whole fruit and discards the stainless steel filter in favor of a plastic filter that is easier to clean.
Self-feeding juicers, such as Hurom’s H200 Easy Clean slow juicer, make juice extraction easier.It can handle whole fruits-about three medium-sized apples, and larger pieces of fruit that are not suitable-which shortens preparation time, and it is vertically integrated and has a small footprint.
There are two schools of thought about self-contained juicers.Some people find that they are too easily overloaded, overwhelmed and blocked.The other is that you can save a lot of time: in the three years we spent with them, we only encountered problems when trying to juice overripe fruits, including pears, plums and peaches, which became unfeedable Mushy chaos.
Of all the juicers we have tested, this machine provides the highest yield and the least foam. At 50 RPM, it is 10 RPM slower than H-AI (the slow juicer we chose before) and Kuvings. The whole slow juicer.
Although the H200 can effortlessly produce a perfect, rich, and foam-free juice from the whole fruit, which left a deep impression on us, what we like most is its ease of cleaning.It comes with a small brush to remove fine pulp, but we are not sure if you will need it.As advertised, cleaning is as simple as running each component underwater.
H200 is a powerful, easy-to-use, easy-to-clean juicer suitable for cabinets. It can produce high-quality juice effortlessly, but it is heavy and expensive.
Breville Juice Fountain Plus: If you really want a centrifugal juicer, this is one of the best in its class.We have used it many times in the past, and we have seen it in a few small juice stalls, and the price is right.Nevertheless, it still produces a lot of foam and is much larger than our recommended vertical slow juicer.
Omega VSJ843: Almost every part of this juicer is the same as Hurom HP.The biggest difference is that it provides a 15-year warranty for “parts and performance”, while the Hurom juicer motor provides a 10-year warranty, and other parts provide a two-year warranty.Finally, the motor warranty is a bigger consideration, because if you damage the part (and not due to a defect), you still need to replace it.We will try to compare the customer service between the two companies for further consideration.
Breville Bluicer: If you happen to need a juicer and a blender at the same time, this may be a convenient machine, but it is large and contains many parts (let alone storage) that you may not want to use.We found that the juice yield is so low and the foam volume is so high, apart from other unfavorable factors such as size and noise, we decided not to recommend it in this guide.
Hamilton Beach Big Mouth: This centrifugal high-speed juicer is more affordable than Breville Juice Fountain Plus, but it produces a lot of foam when it works.
Oster’s self-cleaning professional juicer: This high-speed (centrifugal) juicer is another device that is too large and complicated for most people.It works, although you still need to do some cleanup afterwards.Nonetheless, if you really want a high-speed juicer, it is a good choice for budget options, and we like that it can be cleaned in the dishwasher.
Smeg Slow Juicer: Smeg’s Slow Juicer has many of the same qualities as Omega VSJ843 or Hurom HP, but for about US$500, you are mainly paying for the retro charm of the 1950s.If it’s worth it to you, then go for it.This is a powerful machine, and our tester is still very strong after using it every week for more than two years.
We test the capabilities of each juicer based on various fruits and vegetables.In each case, the size of the cut we put into each juicer depends on the size of the bud or funnel of the juicer.
No matter what kind of fruit is tested, we will weigh the fruit in advance, measure the extract in fluid ounces, and compare the volume of discarded pulp.
Apples: We usually cut apples into quarters, but in the case of an automatic feeding juicer, we cored most of the apples, and in the first round of testing the automatic feeder, we put the whole apple in it (although This is more for stress testing).The brand recommends not to put the whole apple in the machine, because the seeds can cause problems.
Beets: Among the denser and harder options, beets are a good test.Some juicers groan softly in the beets, but the juicer we recommend is fine.
Carrots: Similar to beets, carrots can easily expose the weakness of the juicer.Carrots are often highly indicative of the extraction quality of the pulp, because the drier the pulp, the more the juicer extracts.(This is the case for almost everything, but we found that carrots show the best range of variation.)
Grapes: Grapes are another good extraction method, and some juicers cannot extract them well.We can judge this by looking at the pulp container and finding the juice there.In the case of an automatic feeding juicer, the grapes may also become messy and not processed.
Kale: Green leafy vegetables are another reason to buy a chewing (slow) juicer.Centrifugal juicers usually do not extract well, while the slow rotating auger of the chewing juicer can effectively extract as much as possible.
Oranges: Some juicers come with citrus attachments. Although they can best maintain low foam levels, we also peel the navel oranges and put them in a funnel (slice or whole, depending on the situation), seeds, etc.Again, seeds are not a good idea, but for testing, we made sure that the machine can handle the seeds, and the orange seeds don’t seem to be as harmful as apple seeds.Overall, the orange juice is good, and in the end they did not prove to be of very good quality.However, be aware that high-speed juicers produce a lot of orange foam.
We weigh the product beforehand to make sure that we put the same amount in each juicer, and then measure the volume (fluid ounce) of the resulting juice.
We noticed the amount of foam that settles on top of each cup of juice, the rate of oxidation (some juices brown faster than others), and the amount of pulp left.
And, of course, we measured the taste, whether it is subjective, and found that some juices are more watery than others (we used a fine filter throughout the test), while others are very rich.
Post time: Dec-25-2021
